Vivifex
← vivifex.comTalonsOS — treatment logging for specialists who bill a national health service. The person is left with the codes and the approval, not with the counting.
The problem
Every patient’s visits had to be found in a paper journal and added up to produce one number for the monthly return. Once a month, for each patient separately. That is where the twenty-four hours went — not into treating anybody.
One physiotherapist, July 2026: 249 rows, 173 visits, 68 patients. We have no other number, and there will be no invented one.
How it works
By evening the day has already happened. The day’s report is pulled out and dropped in; days accumulate into a month, and substitutions are already in it.
Time from–to, summed per patient per month. That number is what goes into the monthly return — nobody counts it by hand again.
4,427 codes, checked daily. Tariff changes are published ahead of time, so a user hears about them before they take effect — and sees only their own codes.
The full catalogue is a layer nobody edits by hand. A speciality is only a starting set, never a filter — a real list crosses sections.
Warnings ask, never block. Which code belongs to which visit stays the person’s responsibility, and no logic overrules them.
The monthly export is a routine, not an exit hatch. Nobody is ever locked out of their own records.
Why it is here
TalonsOS is small on purpose. It does not treat anyone, it does not decide anything clinical, and it does not ask a practice to change how it works. It takes one repeating count off a person’s evening and keeps a catalogue up to date so nobody has to watch a tariff page.
The same method fits any speciality that bills the state — only the list of codes changes. And it fits a great deal that has nothing to do with medicine: wherever data already exists somewhere and somebody is still counting it by hand.
The panel itself is in Latvian and behind a password — this page is about what it does, not a way in.
Tell us what takes those hours in your work — we will say honestly whether it is worth building.